Skip to content

Update DocStrings #662

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 27, 2025
Merged

Update DocStrings #662

merged 2 commits into from
May 27, 2025

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented May 27, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Especially for the classes the users are interacting with

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved and clarified documentation for executor classes, including updated import examples and more precise descriptions of supported backends and usage scenarios.
    • Corrected instructions regarding parameter settings for switching to the pmix backend when using OpenMPI 5 or higher.
    • Enhanced consistency in class references and streamlined explanations across all relevant executor documentation.

@jan-janssen
Update DocStrings
062eedc 
Especially for the classes the users are interacting with
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This update revises documentation and docstrings across several executor classes to clarify import paths and class references. All mentions of the generic executorlib.Executor are replaced with specific executor class names, and import examples are updated to use the top-level executorlib module. The FluxClusterExecutor constructor now conditionally selects the executor type based on a flag. No functional code or logic is otherwise changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/installation.md Clarified that flux_executor_pmi_mode="pmix" must be set on FluxJobExecutor or FluxClusterExecutor for PMIx backend switching.
executorlib/executor/flux.py Updated docstrings and import examples for FluxJobExecutor and FluxClusterExecutor with explicit class names and updated import paths; modified FluxClusterExecutor constructor to conditionally select executor type based on plot_dependency_graph flag.
executorlib/executor/single.py Updated docstrings and import examples in SingleNodeExecutor to use explicit class names and consistent import paths.
executorlib/executor/slurm.py Revised docstrings and import examples for SlurmClusterExecutor and SlurmJobExecutor to use explicit class names and updated import paths.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update Documentation #558: Updates documentation and clarifies that flux_executor_pmi_mode="pmix" applies specifically to FluxJobExecutor and FluxClusterExecutor, similar to this PR’s documentation focus.

Poem

In the warren of code, we hop and revise,
Docstrings now sparkle, imports precise.
No more confusion, each class stands tall—
Flux, Slurm, and Single, we’ve named them all!
With clarity bright, our docs now delight,
🐇✨ Happy coding, day and night!

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 062eedc and 6116541.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • executorlib/executor/flux.py (6 hunks)
  • executorlib/executor/single.py (3 hunks)
  • executorlib/executor/slurm.py (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • executorlib/executor/single.py
  • executorlib/executor/slurm.py
  • executorlib/executor/flux.py
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.82%. Comparing base (9b9f51e) to head (6116541).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #662   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.82%   96.82%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        1290     1290           
=======================================
  Hits         1249     1249           
  Misses         41       41

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 2d4c138 into main May 27, 2025
30 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the docstring branch May 27, 2025 06:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jan-janssen